Gary Valenciano is one of the more popular personalities who sincerely believes that Hubert Webb is innocent of the crime that he is accused of . In fact, Gary took the stand and said under oath that he saw Hubert Webb in the States.
In today's front pages of major newspapers, former Vice- President Teofisto Guingona has asked the Supreme Court for a reversal of its decision of acquittal for Hubert Webb. For the former vice-president, it is clear as day that Hubert Webb is indeed the man behind the gruesome massacre that took place two decades ago.
Between the two, I see Teofisto Guingona as the more credible personality. It is truly unfortunate that Gary Valenciano has allowed himself to be used by the Webbs in this highly controversial case. Perhaps, if only to teach a lesson, people can consider a boycott of popular personalities who carelessly use their name and popularity.
I do believe that Hubert Webb was in the States in 1991 like what Gary Valenciano has said under oath. But I also believe that Hubert was in the country on the night of the massacre. Hubert left the country for the States after the massacre took place.
yah! coz politicians in the country are "more credible" ..."more honest"....( sarcastic)
ReplyDeletehahaha. that's right. The American Immigration somehow lost Hubert's record of travelling back to the Philippines and then back to the US. That's how incompetent US immigration is. (sarcastic too!)
ReplyDeleteSo if Gary V, a very credible Christian, chose to allow himself to be used by the Webb's then does that mean he committed perjury and lied? Yeah, let's believe Jessica Alfaro whom in the first place, was an NBI asset and not really a star witness. Her star witness chose not to appear so she took the place of the star witness. That does not sound like 'reasonable doubt', right? It can't be. (non-stop sarcasm)
dear anonymous,
ReplyDeletethank you for reading my blog.
where did you get the idea that jessica alfaro worked for the nbi ? check out her records. if she was employee or an asset of the nbi, please post it here. i dare anyone of you to produce an nbi record that she was employed by the nbi or that she was an asset.
keep reading.
guingona more credible.....? Congrats to you..you just raised the word moron to another level..youre the man! Fact is..there is no english word to describe your piece....
ReplyDeletedear anonymous,
ReplyDeletethank you for reading my post.
i definitely think guingona is a more credible person than gary valenciano. remember, he has the doj secretary at the time the case was being investigated. also, do you know that what the webbs have presented in court are photocopied documents ? in fact, the webbs in all of the 20 years i think have not presented hubert's original passport in court. my dare still stands. present concrete proof that alfaro was an nbi asset.
keep reading.
dear anonymous,
ReplyDeletei forgot to tell you that gary valenciano said that he saw hubert webb in the states four months after the massacre.
so who's the moron now ?
Hi, I just happened to stumble upon your post here. While I respect your personal opinions on the guilt/innocence of Hubert Webb (and I respect your right to air them), you may want to read the SC decision first before saying that Jessica Alfaro was not an NBI asset. The decision clearly narrated the testimony of an NBI agent (Sacaguing)proving that Alfaro was an NBI asset, which notably was NEVER rebutted by Alfaro and/or the prosecution. The fact that Alfaro was an NBI asset was duly proven by Sacaguing; it was therefore Alfaro's or the prosecution's burden to refute Sacaguing's claim.
ReplyDeleteI note in your later post (re: boycott of Mo Twister's blog) that Hubert's innocence was upheld by a court where his relative was sitting. You may want to know that his "relatives" inhibited themselves (or did not take part) in the voting for this case. Clearly, there is no basis for your insinuation that Hubert's acquittal was "tainted" by the fact that he had relatives in the SC.
Don't get me wrong, I sympathize with Mr. Vizconde and wish that the real killers are put behind bars soon. But did you ever ask, what if Hubert was really innocent (as what was found by the SC)? Won't imprisoning him for the rest of his life be unjust as well if he were truly innocent?
dear anonymous,
ReplyDeletethank you for reading my post.
you are right that the sc said that alfaro was an nbi asset. this is precisely why atty. acosta wanted to reopen the trial because the sc erred in its evaluation of the case. again, it is so easy for you to check if alfaro was ever in the payroll of the nbi. does it makes sense to you that the nbi will get a drug addict as an asset ? why would nbi get an asset that's prone to delusions and hallucinations due to drugs ?
the mere presence of a relative of the webbs in the supreme court certainly taints the judgement of the supreme court. whether he voted or not is not the issue. the issue is whether his presence could influence the other justices to vote in his relative's favor.
lastly, why does mr. vizconde refuse to believe that hubert webb is innocent of the crime that he is accused of ? mr. vizconde wants justice. and by justice we mean punishing those who really committed the crime. nothing more, nothing less.
A blog where everyday topics are discussed objectively to arrive at the truth. -- yeah right.. one sided post. :P
ReplyDelete